McKinsey lays framework for reducing plastic pollution and increasing circularity

US – McKinsey & Company has released a report laying the groundwork for the global reduction of plastic waste to improve circularity through the collection, sortation, and recycling capacity of plastic packaging.

The company predicts that supply chains will continue to favor plastics in the production of packaging in spite of efforts to cut down on waste.

It suggests that fifteen countries contribute 270 million metric tons of waste each year – 80% of the worldwide total – and that 85% of the plastic waste mismanaged globally comes from Asia.

The company also warns that a complete lack of waste management systems in certain locations is the real cause of such vast amounts of plastic waste.

As such, it identifies waste reduction and the need for circularity as the two primary challenges currently faced by producers of plastic packaging.

According to the company, one comprehensive, integrated system would be more effective in practice than various region-specific approaches to improving the management of waste, especially where low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are concerned.

The cost of implementing new disposal systems – which calls for the building of new roads, waste-to-energy facilities, and landfills, amongst other investments – would supposedly come at a price of between US$560 billion and US$680 billion over ten years.

McKinsey believes it would assist economic development by smoothening the process of transportation and commerce.

It is also said that reducing pollution would improve public health and regulate around 850 million tons of projected waste every year.

The company is calling upon governments to prioritize waste management through both public and private funding.

It acknowledges its progress in enforcing regulations across the world, including extended producer responsibility (EPR) regulations, restrictions on single-use plastics, and recycled content requirements.

Yet legal ambiguity surrounding land use, foreign investment, the diversion of funds, and cooperation within the layers of government are all noted as potential pitfalls in the matter.

In addition, the company is also advising stakeholders to consider economic prosperity when addressing issues surrounding plastic waste.

McKinsey believes that technological solutions are better suited to wealthier areas, whereas the less wealthy may benefit more from labor-intensive options.

Collaboration across the value chain is identified as an area in need of improvement. Setting up collaboration frameworks and incentive mechanisms is said to be the key to accessing plastic waste feedstock of consistent quality with maximum cost-efficiency.

Across the world, public- and private-sector alliances are forming to push for positive change; McKinsey counts over 80 global companies whose sustainability goals include achieving 15 to 50 percent recycled content by 2025, some going so far as to pay premiums for recycled content.

Another report by McKinsey suggested that greenhouse gas emissions were being left out of conversations surrounding the production of plastic packaging and argued that other forms of packaging resulted in higher carbon levels.

The company also weighed in on chemical pollution, calling upon packaging companies to enforce stricter regulations on the chemicals they use.

Liked this article? Subscribe to our regular email newsletters with the latest news insights from Africa and the World’s packaging and printing industry. SUBSCRIBE HERE.

Related posts:

Carton in aseptic packaging: A sustainable solution for the food and beverage industry  Konica Minolta unveils JETvarnish 3D Web 400 embellishment press, Memjet debuts DuraCore print engine UPM names Mika Kekki as new Executive Vice President, Cascades restructures to drive growth Etirama expands product line with innovative slitter and rewinder machine