ECHA updates PFAS restriction plan, excludes eight sectors amid criticism

EUROPE – The European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) has revised its approach to restricting per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), excluding eight sectors from detailed evaluations, a move that has sparked debate. 

The decision, announced in August 2025, affects industries like printing, sealing, machinery, explosives, military, technical textiles, broader industrial uses, and medical applications.

According to ECHA, time constraints prevent its Risk Assessment (RAC) and Socio-Economic Analysis (SEAC) committees from conducting sector-specific assessments for these areas.

An ECHA spokesperson stated that the committees will focus on 14 original sectors, including food contact materials, packaging, and cosmetics, alongside PFAS manufacturing. 

“Our assessments of cross-cutting issues, like concentration limits and risk management, will apply universally,” the spokesperson said. 

The agency aims to finalize evaluations by late 2025, with opinions delivered to the European Commission (EC) in 2026 for a final decision.

Theresa Kjell, head of policy at ChemSec, criticized the exclusion, arguing it undermines the EU’s plan to curb PFAS pollution. 

She suggested ECHA’s approach could weaken efforts to address contamination in water, soil, and human health by not fully evaluating alternatives for these sectors. 

Kjell emphasized the need for time-limited exemptions only for essential uses, warning that ECHA’s strategy might delay effective regulation.

ECHA defended its process, noting that over 5,600 responses from stakeholders, including academia and NGOs, were received during a 2023 consultation. 

These informed the inclusion of the eight additional sectors in the updated proposal, submitted by Denmark, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway, and Sweden. 

The agency insists the restriction scope remains comprehensive, covering all PFAS uses, and builds on the EU’s history of regulating these “forever chemicals” under frameworks like the Stockholm Convention.

Recent developments, reported on September 10, 2025, by Chemical Watch, indicate ECHA is exploring alternative restriction options, such as controlled use of PFAS in critical sectors like electronics and energy, to balance environmental goals with industry needs. 

This follows concerns from industry groups about the feasibility of a blanket ban, with some advocating for exemptions where substitutes are unavailable.

Kjell remains skeptical, arguing that incomplete data could hinder the EC’s decision-making.

“The EC needs comprehensive information to act decisively,” she said. 

As the EU pushes for a potential PFAS ban by 2026, the debate highlights tensions between urgent environmental action and practical industry considerations.

Subscribe to our email newsletters that provide busy executives like you with the latest news insights and trends from Africa and the World. SUBSCRIBE HERE